Colleague Mirror
A report comparing your view of your professional style with a real colleague's view, gap by gap.
How does a real colleague see your professional style compared to how you see it? Your self-view is compared with how the people you invite see you through a short questionnaire of four minutes at most, and you receive a reading for each dimension with the size and direction of the gap, the signal quality and the number of raters. No result appears before at least one rater respond.
What's included
- Learn the real difference between your professional style as you see it and how a colleague who actually works with you sees it
- Identify which behavioral dimensions stay stable across different colleagues and which shift by interaction context
- Get a realistic basis for improving your effect in the workplace instead of relying on your own guess alone
Categories
Frequently asked questions
Will my colleague know that I saw their specific response?
Yes. This pattern is called the named dyad -- it never promises hidden identity, because you invited them by name in the first place. Your colleague knows from the start, before they begin answering, that you will know they were the one who answered, even if they choose not to display their name inside the report itself.
How many colleagues can I invite?
At least one colleague, with no hard upper limit -- you can invite a second or third colleague if you want to see more than one perspective. Each invited colleague result is shown independently alongside the others, not blended into a single average that hides the differences between them.
Does my colleague see my personal result?
No, never. Your colleague completes a short questionnaire about your style only and receives no report, link, or result in return -- neither now nor later. This is stated clearly in the invite text they receive before they begin.
How accurate and reliable is this analysis?
Its reliability is shown dimension by dimension, not as one blended number. When your invited colleagues readings agree on a given dimension, it is shown to you as a reliable signal; when they diverge sharply, you are told that plainly -- the variance itself is information about how your style depends on interaction context, not a measurement error.
Who benefits most from this analysis?
Anyone preparing for a performance review or promotion, anyone moving into a role requiring wider coordination with other teams, and anyone who feels uncertain about how colleagues actually perceive their professional style instead of continuing to guess.
How long until my result appears?
There is no fixed number -- it depends on how quickly the invited colleague responds. In practice this usually falls between one and fourteen days, and the invite link stays valid for a full 14 days.
Can I invite the same rater again later to measure change?
Yes, and this fits this product particularly well -- re-invite the same colleague after a few months of working on the development areas the report revealed, and compare the new result to this one to see whether the gap actually narrowed. The comparison is not computed automatically; you are the one who reads the difference between two separate reports.
What if two invited colleagues contradict each other?
This actually happens and is not a measurement error. When two invited colleagues sharply disagree on a given dimension, it often means your style genuinely shifts depending on the nature of the relationship or collaboration context with each of them -- practical information worth exploring, not worrying about, and it is explicitly classified in your report as a disagreement worth your curiosity.
User reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to review